The Decline of the Gentleman Scientist and it’s Effect on the Public Awareness of Planet X.

Earth is stopped in orbit by the powerful influence of Planet X. The STO Zetas of ZetaTalk explain that planetary orbits are “not sacred”, they can be altered if sufficiently powerful forces are in play. Earth is held in its circular orbit around the Sun by other solar system dynamics: a balance of gravity-attraction and repulsion-forces. The anti-clockwise orbit of Earth is maintained by the sweeping arms of our rotating central star, but when an orbiting planet encounters a dense brown dwarf near it’s orbit-path, it has no choice but to halt. Earth also has a counter-orbiting buddy, a dead twin (Earth’s Dead Twin – EDT) which is the Hopi “Blue Kachina”. We see it occasionally now because when Earth halted in it’s orbit, EDT continued from it’s 180 degree position opposite of Earth and came up to stop behind Earth. So since about 2004, Earth, EDT and Venus have been captured in a particle-flow “cup” – graphically represented as the faint red enclosure.



Gentleman scientist Alexander Graham Bell demonstrating his “telephone” at the Centennial Exhibition in Philadelphia on June 25, 1876.


1850 – The SS Baltic was a wooden-hulled sidewheel steamer built in 1850 that operated between New York and Liverpool. It was the fastest and most luxurious transatlantic steamship of it’s day crossing the Atlantic in slightly less than 10 days. This was before the days of telephone and travel was very slow, thus a gentleman scientist in those days depended very much on his own deliberations.

A gentleman scientist is a man so dedicated to his scientific interest in a subject that he embarks on a path of study and experimentation based on scientific principles, such as mathematics, chemistry or astronomy under his own financial steam. This expression characterizes the early scientists in the modern age of “western” science that began sometime in the 1600s. In the meantime, I have no doubt that there were many private men of science in other countries not noted by conventional history and since these early modern times were still influenced by the age of Pisces, a patriarchal age, most scientists were male. By and large these men were not beholden to a particular interest group such as a financial supporter, but were able to explore the natural world with abandon and without fear of retribution of their peers. On the other hand, it is likely that there was one special interest group whose needs may have fell upon a married gentleman scientist, namely his wife and family.  Obviously, other scientists would perhaps be jealous or critical of a fellow scientist who has made a recognized discovery, but since the scientist of note was operating on “his own dime”, this nor the needs of his family, were not necessarily a hindrance to the quality of his scientific work. Some examples of early notable gentleman scientists would be Charles Darwin: evolutionary theory, Henry Cavendish: discoverer of Hydrogen, Robert Boyle: one of the founders of modern chemistry. Henry Talbot: developed the precursors to the photographic process. Of course one has to mention the free thinkers such as Buckminster fuller: the buckyball and Philo Farnsworth with his early work in developing the television. There were gentle-women scientists too, such as Marie Curie: a Nobel Peace prize recipient who did pioneering research on radioactivity and Dorothy Hodgkin, another Nobel prize beneficiary, credited with the development of protein crystallography. Plus there were women like Jane Goodall the anthropologist considered to be the world’s foremost expert on chimpanzees. Whether or not a scientist was a male or a female, those early-modern days (1500 – 1800) had a kind of innocence about them that was protected by the difficulties of far-travel and communication. These were the days even before the telephone, when inter-continental travel was by ocean-going steamships requiring almost a month to transit from the U.S. east coast to England and commercial airline travel was only possible a hundred years later. A scientist in those times was therefore less encumbered by a political or cultural climate, thus exempted, had the privilege to draw his or her own conclusions.

Fast forward 100 years. The condition of today’s modern society, has changed the face and mind of the men and women science. This is partially due to the hold that the banking industry has on our medium of exchange: money, driving up the cost of goods and real estate putting pressure on to perform. Also, the massive growth of international corporations and government-supported University education, the two now entwined, over-focusing scientific study due to selfish corporate interests. Of course the U.S. military has tightened its dastardly grip on patents preventing many wonderful new innovations from benefiting the public at large and at the same time has driven scientific work towards the attainment of the advantage on the field and skies of war.  Police-states and the proliferation of laws, lawyers and the courts have become the extended hand of the avaricious corporations and the very wealthy and powerful. Finally, scientific peer review organizations such as the various academy of science bodies and the old Royal society, the mainstays of the scientific status quo, are now controlled top-down by the corporations, governments and the military as well. Today, there is hardly room for the gentle-person scientist, east or west, and the nearest equivalent of a gentleman/woman scientist is referred to as a: “Citizen Scientist”. The Citizen scientist are considered laymen, but doing essential environmental work that governments and corporations are either refusing to do or avoiding. Our various cultures have swallowed the bitter pill of subservience to the governmental and corporate  monsters. Governments of the world are corrupt and cannot stand alone against international corporations save perhaps, few: Iceland (threw out the banks) and Norway (government is highly oriented to the welfare of it’s people). Of the new influx of scientific minds, I am sure there are many exceptions to the corporate-scientist. I firmly believe that the men and woman in the field gathering data are still just as starry-eyed as those in their private labs back in the day. Yet data has to be collated, studied and results be re-applied in a lab or in some controlled environment and these facilities are owned by governments and the corporations….. Here is evidence of what I am saying, a new opinion piece at National Geographic declaring that science is running out of things to discover. This latter story is clear evidence of the results when allowing corporate meddling in science. Here is an article at the National Post exposing the degradation of modern scientific journal publications, apparently anyone can “publish” any quality of scientific work for $500. This is the unfortunate truth of modern-day scientific work: a hostile environment for the purity of scientific thought and exploration of new ideas.
Flashing back to this early-modern period, it was then that fellow gentleman scientists independently discovered aberrations in the orbits of the outer planets that lead to the discovery of Planet X, but societal conditions underwent massive changes in the meanwhile. So, it is ironic, that due to erosive sea-changes in the freedom of expression of modern society, now the gentleman scientist has not only faded from existence, but his gradual replacement by the corporate-government scientist, cannot report on Planet X which is standing on the ecliptic at this very moment.


1914 – Persival Lowell at 59 observing Venus during the day with his Clark refracting telescope in Flagstaff Arizona.


It was in 1906, when another wealthy gentleman scientist: Percival Lowell, continued to seek the cause of the orbital perturbations of the outer planets of Uranus and Neptune started by his predecessors Adams and Leverrier 76 years earlier. Lowell virtually built his own astronomical observatory in 1894 to look for Planet X. Certainly such an investment is not a casual intention, but it reveals a determined heart and a keen and persistent mind. Although he died in the fall of 1916 failing to find his elusive planet, he is credited with it’s modern name: Planet X. However, if you read about Lowell’s drive to discover Planet X at, you would think that the man was a fool and a dullard to spend his remaining 23 years looking for his Planet X. However, this was a man who’s initials (P L) have been combined by the astronomical community to denote Pluto and therefore the name of Pluto:  ….which in anyone’s books is a great honor. This belittling is also true of the work of Zecharia Sitchin who wrote “The 12th Planet“, an amazing book which points to the existence of Nibiru (Planet X) and the Annunaki who use Planet X as a home. When one observes the disparaging viewpoints of the elite hierarchy against the works of Lowell and Sitchin, there is clearly a deep disconnect considering the public’s  open-armed acceptance of the works of these two men.

In these times, much of the public accesses information such as history, science and news via the internet, within a few seconds one can explore almost any subject with a few mouse clicks. The advent of the Internet vastly improved many aspects of the lives of those who could afford to own a computer and access to Internet, but there is a massive problem that developed in the interim. First, let’s consider the book. There was a time when one had to go to a public or a University library and spend many hours pouring over reference texts, published scientific works and newspaper articles to research a subject. A book, once printed and published, provided anyone who could read the information therein. It is no wonder that the powerful factions of the day would burn books they didn’t want the public to read. With the internet, the content of a webpage can be altered at any time, even anonymously. This is the problem. In my 6 and a half years of researching and reporting on Planet X, I have seen many blatantly false reports on subjects, even at Also, many articles relating to NASA’s activities in space that support ZetaTalk have simply disappeared, when at the same time, articles on an unrelated subject of a similar age are still available. So we know it’s not about the age of an article, but about the subject.

Today, since the subject of Planet X and the Pole-Shift is censored, it remains for the interested party to determine the truth about Planet X. But how does one do that without the concern of disinformation poisoning the soup of knowledge? The first place to look for the truth about Planet X would be the ZetaTalk website. Nonetheless, this website is massive and requires a great deal of patience to wade through, hence the reason why I write on ZetaTalk. On the other hand, ancient texts go right to the point: the Christian Bible and the Qu’ran (Koran) for instance have many references to Planet X and the Pole-Shift. Edgar Cayce, Mother Shipton and many other prophets have predicted the appearance of a second sun and a Pole-Shift. Cave drawings and rock carvings from many different ancient cultures have also indicated the same, but when is the Pole-Shift due to occur? Obviously, given the state of Human development and spiritual protocols, humans are not to know the date. Yet the actual Pole-Shift (PoleShift) date is not necessary to know anyway, since Planet X will show himself many weeks before the Pole-Shift. So the reality is we need to educate ourselves as to what form the appearance of Planet X will take. There are pre-conditions to the nearby passage of Planet X, such as sporadic global-wide dusting of red dust from the trash-cloud of Planet X, but that is only days prior to the Pole-Shift. Probably the most obvious will be the “tipping” of Earth, with the famous ancient accounts of the “3 days of darkness” and the “6 days of sunrise west” (for most people in the northern hemisphere), certainly the latter would be within weeks of the Pole-Shift. Now since we are preparing for a pre-industrial, agrarian lifestyle after the Pole-Shift, we need the time and money to buy what we need. We need a safe location to ride-out the Pole-Shift, and we need a safe-route beforehand to get there, so much thought and planning needs to be applied. Therefore, for those who require visual proof of Planet X, they will need to keep an eye on the skies for the first appearances of a “second sun” visible by the naked eye. For those others who are already convinced of the imminence of the Pole-Shift, they are either already prepared or are preparing now.
Chris Thomas.

Planet X and Pole-Shift information is based on ZetaTalk. Art is by Chris Thomas.

Planet X and the Pole-Shift Emblazoned on an Ancient Mayan Tablet


Figure 1 – This image clearly shows three heavenly bodies:  Earth at right-middle with an atmosphere indicated,  a typical placement of the Sun, upper-middle and an obvious very energetic heavenly body, left-middle. The shape extending toward Earth is the massive tail of Planet X which is the cause of the globally devastating asteroid and rock hail, sheets of fire and the classic red dust fall just before and during the hour of the Pole-Shift. In addition, we also expect electrical disturbances from it’s charged tail many months before the Pole-Shift itself; we also have to protect electronic devices against EMP weeks before the Pole-Shift due to the close proximity of Planet X itself. The space vehicles aloft on the tablet indicate the Annunaki royalty escaping the Pole-Shift event above Earth at a safe distance. (info sourced from Art by Chris Thomas.

New source of Mayan artifacts – An image (figure 1) of a heretofore unknown Mayan tablet, held in escrow by the Mexican government for 80 years, caught my attention a few weeks ago, so I took a desktop capture of it as it is extremely revealing regarding Planet X and the Pole-Shift.  This seminal image, taken from a video-lecture (viewable at the bottom of this page) by Nassim Haramein, is part of a larger collection that was purportedly released to the public by the Mexican government as reported by Steve Pond, editor at on September 26, 2011. The Website article, from a telephone interview with C. Raul Julia-Levy, a Mexican film and television actor, was also a heads-up for a video documentary apparently in production called: “Revelations of the Mayans 2012 and Beyond”. This documentary film was apparently to document the importance of Mexican history based on discoveries from a key Mayan site at Calakmul, which is a Maya archaeological site in the Mexican state of Campeche, deep in the jungles of the greater Petén Basin region in southern Mexico. The primary buzz from this public release was more in relation to the Science of Ufology and Mexico’s historical context with ET or “alien” contact, yet I could see the Planet X/Pole-Shift connection right away. Since most people are not educated about the nature of Planet X and it’s history of passages over Eons of time, all viewpoints were focused on the obvious graphic UFO aspects of the Mayan Tablet shown in Figure 1. In the video seen below, not a clue is had of the real  importance of this Mayan tablet release. The only two remaining shapes in Figure 1 that I cannot explain is the dark triangle at the center of the energetic body: Planet X, and the little half-moon shape within the extension directed at Earth: “the tail of Planet X”, other than that, it is a glaringly obvious warning of the passage of Planet X and the resulting Pole-Shift.

Site of Calakmul

The ancient Mayan city of Calakmul (300 BC – to – 900 AD), in the Mexican state Campeche, has 6,000 structures over  292,594 acres of currently protected land and wildlife; it was once home to an estimated 50,000 souls. (Image credit –

A back story was revealed while researching this article which I believe is part of the Planet X cover-up. Apparently the executive producer of the video documentary  “Revelations of the Mayans 2012 and Beyond” Elisabeth Thieriot, has allegedly absconded with all the raw footage (contained on 10 hard drives and a dozen computers) that was shot at Calakmul in preparation for the documentary production. As of May 9, 2012, the documentary production was stymied with finger-pointing and court cases. You have to ask yourself: “Why run away with the raw footage of video documentary?” Surely a for-the-public video would eventually re-surface elsewhere and the perpetrators be found and prosecuted? So, where is the value in that purely as a theft other than to prevent public exposure? It follows that, considering this documentary contained: “claims of classified archaeological discoveries, dire predictions and extraterrestrial contact” and with obvious graphic references (Figure 1) indicating historical evidence of Planet X, this can only be another Planet X cover-up, deletion-style. In a similar vein, the internet-wide removal of the 2004 Woodbridge Crop Circle is another of this cover-up style.


Woodbridge crop circle – July 13, 2004. The nuclear symbol in the center of two closed circles is a reassurance by the ET circle makers that the sun is not a nuclear threat.
This crop circle entirely refutes “The Sun is a threat to Earth” lie-concept forwarded by the Elite Hierarchy cover-up campaign, therefore the Figure 1 heavenly body at left-middle is Planet X and not the Sun as commonly believed. Keep this in mind when watching the video at the bottom of my article: The Sun is safe. (Credit –

The Figure 1 Mayan tablet is a crushing blow to the Planet X cover-up effort, it’s no wonder the  “Revelations of the Mayans 2012 and Beyond” film  footage was stolen, but there is confusion among many “experts” on archaeological finds that illustrate prior Pole-Shifts: they don’t recognize the message. To wit, the black ops lie: “The Sun is a threat” still reigns supreme, even though the other black ops lie: “Global Warming” is taking a kicking these days with scientists claiming a cooling globe since 1997. This demonstrates that the “Global Warming” Planet X cover-up campaign is based on a fixed and forced viewpoint and not live data, although it’s name has morphed from: “Global Warming Theory” to “Global Warming” and these days is referred to as: “Climate Change”, yet I predict the insidious and well-funded Elite hierarchy Planet X cover-up management will find a way to leverage the cooling globe data to fit some other style of Planet X-deception scheme. The G.W. Theory lie was crafted a long time ago, based on a much more naive public with an non-existent public Internet; so these days with the increasing effects from a Planet X-induced Earth Wobble, the weather no longer fits the placid and predictable models of 20 years ago just prior to the entry of Planet X in our Solar system.

Planet X and Pole-Shift details are credited to Nancy Lieder of The opinions in this piece, however, are my own.
Chris Thomas.

Tyche: The Veil of Nibiru

The Oort Cloud in the Kuiper belt region at the very outer edge of our solar system as envisioned by Kagaya, a Japanese digital fine artist. This image gives us an idea of the scale of the hypothesized Oort Cloud, but it is thought to be mainly populated by ices of water, ammonia and methane with limited fragments of rock.

According to Greek mythology, Tyche was the “good sister” of Nemesis and the Greek Goddess of fortune and prosperity. However, in deference to the wisdom of the Greeks, there is now a new kind of mythology that, although it has roots within the history of modern astrophysics, does not spring from the likes of the venerated efforts of the eighteenth century astronomers who actually discovered real planets. A true cultural mythology arises from original stories and a set of beliefs passed along from our respective descendants over a long period of time, whereas today’s myths exist only within the Internet culture: mostly a quickly accessible, gullible and easily impressed net-mind.  To wit, considering that NASA and related government agencies have complete control of all scientific data from space probes, satellite and other space vehicles making the sum total of the entire set of space programs under the thumb of the secret government agencies we call “black ops”. It is these militaristic pro-government message cabals  who decide what information is exposed to the public realm and when. Tyche (pronounced ty-kee), the fanciful planet claimed to be 4 times larger than Jupiter that is supposed to be situated within the Oort Cloud: a hypothetical hoard of objects orbiting our solar system at the edge of the Sun’s gravity-influence comprized mainly of scattered water, ammonia and methane ices, is no exception. The Oort Cloud was proposed in 1950 by Jan Hendrik Oort, a Dutch astronomer, to explain long-period comets that occasionally zoom in around the Sun from any possible direction, boil-off and disintegrate; therefore a repository of these objects is believed to exist: the Oort Cloud. Additionally from a published report we have this:  “But scientists now believe the proof of (Tyche’s) existence has already been gathered by a NASA space telescope, Wise, and is just waiting to be analysed.”


The above image is an artist’s conception of the NASA Satellite WISE which was tasked to image the entire sky with a cooled infrared detector (15° Centigrade above absolute zero), by-the-way, perfect for detecting warm dwarf planets transiting the absolute zero background of stars. The Zetas: “Their WISE probe discovered a rogue planet, visible at a distance only in the infrared spectrum, and now it is approaching Earth!” Here is a link to a Youtube video of Amy Mainzer, an american astronomer acting as a public spokesperson for NASA speaking on WISE, here, you can see from 15 to 24 seconds of the video how her body language belies her statement that: “…we don’t think that there is anything hazardous in the outer solar system…”

So here we have two hypotheses, one existing inside the other, and the so-called “proof” of which has been put off to another condition: when some unknown person gets around to doing an evaluation of the cache of data looking for Tyche’s  existence.  The slightly more real, yet unobserved Oort Cloud, whose outer reaches extend to about a light year away from our Sun, has at least some history and a good scientific reason to exist, whereas such a whimsical planet as Tyche has all the wrong reasons to be true and doubting it’s existence is the right stuff.


This image attempts to show how Uranus’ orbit was “pulled ahead” by Nibiru’s gravitational pull (a), and (b), is delayed from it’s predicted orbit position as Uranus moved away from the direction of Nibiru, thus the inverse gravitational influence. This anomaly is what piqued the interest of so many astronomers over the last 168 years. (px art by Chris Thomas).

The covert scientific awareness of Nibiru today can be credited to the discovery of the perturbed orbit of Uranus in 1845 by  John Couch Adams of England and coincidentally by Urbain Leverrier of France in the same year. Uranus was arriving ahead of it’s predicted movement as it approached the constellation Orion on it’s orbit path and lagged behind in it’s progress afterwards.  This realization (mathematically predicted to exist by Le Verrier) lead to the discovery of Neptune on the night of September 23–24, 1846 at the Berlin Observatory by astronomer Johann Gottfried Galle who was working from Le Verrier’s calculations. Now it was also found that Neptune also  had perturbations in it’s orbit, so now the search was on to find the gravitational body responsible. This lead to Clyde Tombaugh’s discovery of Pluto in 1930. Meanwhile in Flagstaff Arizona,  Percival Lowell was pushing ahead to find what he had coined: “Planet X”, the unknown heavenly body that was causing the irregularities in the outer planets of our solar system, but he died unexpectedly in 1916. It wasn’t until 1978 that American astronomer James W. Christy finally determined conclusively that Pluto’s size was only 1/500th that of Earth making it far too small a mass to cause the orbit irregularities of the gas giants. The search for Planet X continued with the chief astronomer of the U.S. Naval Observatory, Robert Harrington during the 1980s and 1990s where he determined that Planet X was 13.5 billion Kms away from our Sun, had a highly eccentric orbit with a 32-degree inclination to the orbital plane, these details which also align well with ZetaTalk. Unfortunately, Robert Harrington died of Cancer on Jan. 23, 1993 and according to the Zetas of ZetaTalk, Robert Harrington was killed as he intended to alert the public to the approach of Planet X. Here is a link to a list of killed or disappeared astronomers since 1981. It’s not a matter of public knowledge of course, but my guess is that it was sometime in the early 1980s that the Planet X cover-up seems to


Planet X as viewed with a telescope with a zoom lens from a backyard in North Carolina in the evening sky April 13, 2003. This is the real deal, but only visible as Planet X was zooming in from outer space; a period of time from about 1995 to late 2003. As Planet X was close-in but not yet near the Sun, it was viewable by binoculars. (Credit details & photo –

have started to develop. Robert Harrington’s paper entitled: “The Location of Planet X” (by R. S. Harrington, October 1988) is here on Harvard Universities servers.
If the plan of the U.S. black ops disinformation artists is to ever so slowly and masterfully reveal the truth about Nibiru (but at some last minute), this would be part of the plan, since with Tyche the mystery continues. Its still a mystery as Tyche, let’s face it, is an imaginary  planet, but what also still has legs is the mystery of perturbed heavenly bodies, but now they are comets. The story goes that in 1999 a small team of scientists dreamed-up Tyche to explain the fact that 20 percent too many comets are “coming from the wrong direction”. Aside from the fact that Tyche is the perfect placement for a public attention redirect from Nibiru/Planet X, planetary scientists have ran out of planets to discover and therefore blame for the mysterious aberrations in comet trajectories. It’s like the effects on heavenly bodies in our solar system caused by Planet X are haunting NASA planetary scientists, astronomers and astrophysicists because the perturbation issue just won’t go away, so they have to invent Tyche. Of course, how could Tyche be hypothetical since the solar system has been scanned with space probes since the Pioneer Program started in the 1960s? In addition, the ISS up since 1998, the 135 Shuttle missions between 1981 and 2011 and 85 current NASA missions still on the books haven’t noticed a planet the size of Tyche within a supposed cloud of comet-sized objects? Granted, the Oort cloud is farther out, yet the Hubble space telescope can “see” out to several billion light-years. So lets end the speculation that NASA et al can’t find a planet within the gravity-sphere of our solar system. NASA needs Tyche to continue the Planet X cover-up, lest a critical mass of the public starts to ask embarrassing questions.


zetaAddendum: Here is a great bit of reading from the Zetas of ZetaTalk on NASAs about face on the existence of wandering planets, Tyche notwithstanding.
NASA’s history of discovery on wandering rogue planets that seem to travel through space independent of a central Sun is not a pretty one. Similar to the Flat Earth the

ory, they clung to their theories righteously, angrily attacking the facts and any messenger bringing them those facts as though their egos were a holy place and the truth were the enemy. When ZetaTalk presented concepts that explained the behavior of such rogue or traveling planets, their failure to follow a circular orbit around a sun and the speed at which they can move through space, Nancy and ourselves were ridiculed for not understanding “the laws” of nature as purported by their God Newton. 

Little by little, inch by inch, they have admitted our facts, always in the context of a human discovery, such is their arrogance. If one revisits the history,  one sees that only since the start of the ZetaTalk saga have humans proposed theories and pursued discovery that remarkably parallel ourexplanations. Now wandering planets, previously denied entirely as even possible, are readily admitted. Previously NASA’s pet theory of “escape velocity” was asserted as a law, where now traveling planets that can escape the gravity draw of a sun, are admitted. 
Since NASA et al were so very busy defending their egos and precious theories, why have we begun to see articles in print wherein astronomers have discovered wandering planets? Why, after the search in the 1980’s for what was called “nemesis”, a gravity body in the direction of the constellation of Orion that was causing perturbations in the outer planets, is this theory now being reactivated? When Planet X was discovered there in 1983, all such talk of a gravity force there was forbidden, as JPL and NASA did indeed find Planet X with their infrared cameras. Is there some benefit to be gained by admitting that traveling planets exist, and encouraging the public to think that such a planet may exist just on the outskirts of the solar system?

When it became obvious that Planet X was zooming into the solar system, at the speed we had predicted, the establishment realized they would likely have to invent an excuse in case the passage was not swift. What if a body were visible, for months or years, so the public became restless and rebellious? While frantically ridiculing Nancy and ourselves, they had their cover-up minions purport that Planet X was “out past Jupiter”, and spread rumors of spots that Google Sky would not display. All the while, of course, Planet X and its Moon Swirls were showing up on SOHO and Stereo images, seen naked eye, and recently made a nice appearance during the May 20-21 (2012) lunar eclipse. Should Planet X itself suddenly become visible to all, they will announce that the suspected nemesis body at the fringes of the solar system moved, and will likely use a number of our explanations for the speed of bodies in space to explain its rapid arrival!

Addendum #2: Here is a link to a wonderful youtube video of Dr. Robert Harrington and Zecharia Sitchin discussing Pluto, the history of the solar system and “the intruder”. Two great scientists in their own field discussing a common interest: Planet X.

The Disappearing Solar Maximum.

Planet X is a massive magnet. The Zetas of explain that the south pole of Planet X is a magnetron intake. In this depiction of Planet X (top image) the real extent of the magnetic lines of force are not shown, they would fill the space between Earth the Sun with their influence. Earth is not shown, but is off-image to the left. In the case of the disappearing solar cycle maximum numbers 23 and 24, the magnetrons otherwise causing sunspots are being drawn into the south pole of Planet X. The image of the Sun shown here was taken by John Chumack from his backyard in Dayton, Ohio on July 7, 2013. Credit: John Chumack | – Artwork by Chris Thomas.

When I started research on the Sun’s magnetic poles to do this article, I found nothing but disinformation. I should  not have been surprized, however. I also found traces of removed  information, which is typical when someone is hiding something. One of the mainstays of the Planet X cover-up maintained by the élite hierarchy is a one hundred percent contrived threat from the Sun, but results from the Ulysses space probe (launched October 6, 1990 to study the Suns magnetic field) challenged this state-approved lie. Quoted from “In 1995, Ulysses saw strong and simple magnetic fields at both poles of the Sun.” (taken from  the JPL website – Jet Propulsion Lab – September 9, 2001). Nancy Lieder of ZetaTalk was one of those few who had noted the results published by JPL at that time, which supported what her Zetas had said all along: that our Sun has defined magnetic poles dominating the solar system. Now, we are certainly aware of the Planet X cover-up, but what has a cover-up of the facts about the Sun’s magnetic poles got to do with Planet X? Plenty, as you will see. First though, I want to focus a little on the timeline-effect of the Planet X cover-up dynamics.

I know many people roll their eyes when they hear of government cover-ups or conspiracy theories, but there is a subtle but far-reaching effect that is needing exposure here that may not be taken into account. The internet is rife with disinformation that has become legitimized. Legitimate in the eyes of the gullible, the uninformed or the casual researcher, in part, as some scientific material is published from a secondary or tertiary standpoint. In other words, scientific research assuming  the truth of a theory, is therefore innocently forwarded by way of reference. But its science, how is that possible? Here is a quote from David Icke: “Like so much in what we call science, that people take it as fact, it’s actually a theory which repeated it becomes fact.” (transcribed from “The moon is not real“). If you believe something is true without independent observation and research, your mind will seek it out. It is also called projection, everybody is susceptible. Scientists are people too, besides, why would they doubt their peers that work for the U.N., the I.P.C.C., the W.M.O.?  Lets also consider, that if a scientist opposes government or corporate-sponsored opinions, you can be sure that their professional life will become uncomfortable and for those who support him or her as well. This is common in the world: a threat from your peers if you oppose their established theories and beliefs, which in turn becomes a subconscious force to be reckoned with when those who you work for make veiled threats to cut-off your money supply. Here are some facts about another cherished theory: the U.S. government spends $10.6 million a day and $4 Billion annually on Climate Change research, and for some reason, some scientists do not not question that and those that do are red-flagged. So, all that money spent pursuing a disputed and unproven theory? We know that many scientists believe these officially established opinions, as when reading published material, not one word is offered-up that throws doubt on a theory supported by high level international organizations.  By-the-way, I am not speaking here of deliberately seeded lies, just disinformation innocently carried forward by others.

Accepted falsehoods have social-consciousness inertia. This occurs in many ways. My guess is that a significant amount of falsehood carry-on, besides published scientific research, is also found in published interviews, opinion pieces by retirees, industry pundits and the many media reports.  So it is this massive volume of “climate change” meta-cognition spin-off that is the problem. Once the cover-up is in place, it is the work of others that accumulates and seemingly buries the switcheroo in the official point-of-view. Two examples of the U.S. space agency about-faces: the original purposes of the Pioneer probes 10 and 11 and the Ulysses space probe were first published then retracted and replaced with a lie. These lies are now lost under the

sheer mass of ongoing published works that had falsely assumed that the stand-in counterfeit reports had value. But lets not forget that the cover-up is also driven forward by new lies seeded with half-truths and the misleading use of facts. There are many other sources of such gullible extrapolations based on government lies such as related science research on another subject that touches on the false theory, new government programs based on the original lie, but with a new vector.  For example, Climate Change (a.k.a. Global Warming Theory) was created as a cover for anticipated earth changes (likely taken from ZetaTalk) once Planet X got close in, as it is now. This is the base lie. Now the “kyoto Accord” or the “Kyoto Protocol” was developed by the United Nations as part of the Climate Change lie, an international treaty to supposedly reduce “greenhouse gas” generated around the globe. (“greenhouse gas” is a misleading moniker used as the main component in the Global Warming Theory lie). Now enters the tertiary effect in the cover-up timeline: “carbon credits”. Now Carbon Credits (one tonne of “greenhouse gas” per) were developed to be a way of dealing and trading against the difficulties of managing “greenhouse gas” or more commonly known as CO² emissions, between countries. From ” Since GHG mitigation projects generate credits, this approach can be used to finance carbon reduction schemes between trading partners and around the world“.  So now you see, one lie built on another and another, this is how the cover-up propagates legitimacy.
The point in question though is: does the Sun have strong north and south magnetic poles? The Zetas of ZetaTalk say yes, but common thought science on the internet says different. If one searches for information on the Sun’s magnetic poles, all they will find is the current theory that claims that diffuse and/or dipole magnetic fields (both polarities side by side) are emanating dynamically from anywhere on Sun’s surface, even assertions that the Sun will manifest “quad poles”, but the most eccentric bald-faced lie is that the north and south magnetic poles “switch” polarity  in concert with the apex of each 11 year solar cycle. It is very odd and perhaps a little scary to find only the official viewpoint of the élite hierarchy on a subject. You would expect (hope?) to find a healthy mix of conflicting opinions and thoughts on a matter, scientists arguing, throwing their hands up in the air and drinking coffee over late night sessions trying to find common ground on the matter, but no, only a single controlled point of view with a slight bloody trail of removed web pages.


Heinrich Schwabe

The discovery of the Sun’s Cycle of maximums is attributed to Samuel Schwabe in 1843, this means the Sun’s 11 year solar cycle has been documented for approximately 170 years. Therefore, I think we can assume the truth of the solar cycle. But these other theories just don’t make sense.  The reasons for this confusing theory not making sense has many threads. First is that the Zetas have said that the sun has normal north and south magnetic pole activity, and on science points like this, they have excellent accuracy and track record. Second is that if all the other planets in our solar system have defined magnetic poles and all stand within the Sun’s magnetosphere, it stands to reason the Sun does as well. Oh, but the third is the worst science of all these recent lie-theories: the “flipping” of Earth’s magnetic poles. Human science has been aware of the Sun’s magnetic field since the 1600’s and we now know that most the planets in our solar system are magnetic and have various north and south pole orientations obviously under a prevailing magnetic regime. We also know that magnets align themselves within a dominant magnetic field. We also knowthat the Sun’s magnetosphere extends beyond Pluto (Voyager 1 has been traversing our solar system for almost 36 years (as of late July 2013), and has traveled 11.6 billion miles and planetary scientists are still not sure if it’s in interstellar space yet). It’s also reasonable that astronomers of old would have defined the appearance of the poles of the solar system planets and would have reported an “upside down” planet by now. There is no mention of flipping planets in the science books.


Woodbridge crop circle – July 13, 2004. The nuclear symbol in the center of two closed circles is a reassurance by the ET circle makers that the sun is not a nuclear threat. (Credit –

Regarding the Black ops lie of our Sun being a threat to Earth, I found another amazingly successful cover-up of a kind of evidence you would not expect: the Internet-wide removal of a specific crop circle! But first, allow me to give a quick background on Crop Circles. Without a doubt, ZetaTalk is the only reliable source in the world on the meaning of crop circles. Over the years, the Zetas of ZetaTalk have described the meanings of many crop circles. The theme is always a thoughtful care that the ET circle-makers offer humankind, consequently, all crop circles offer various kinds of assistance to Earth’s population. The language is subjective in nature, which is why ego-cultural-language is not used but a Universal language of symbol instead. The crop circle in question is known as: Woodbridge (July 13, 2004). The Zetas explain that Woodbridge is a reassurance that the Sun is not a nuclear threat to Earth. This is revealed first by the nuclear symbol in the center of the crop circle that is surrounded  by two other closed circles clearly indicating one hundred percent protection for all planets in our solar system. If a Google search was performed against:  “woodbridge crop circle”, the only image of this crop circle will be found on the ZetaTalk web servers. Now if you go to the best reporting source on crop circles: and run a search, you cannot find this crop circle, it’s like it didn’t happen! So again, Nancy Lieder has the only evidence of another cover-up. Perhaps any remaining conspiracy theory detractors will believe my earlier assertions, that you cannot find the original Ulysses public statement about the Sun’s poles being consistent and strongly polarized. So you can see why the élite hierarchy wanted this very obvious message of solar protection removed, and they did, INTERNET-WIDE.


Sun spot graph for solar maximums 22, 23, and 24 showing the decline in solar maximums. Notice that cycle 24 is not plotted yet, therefore the curve is projected.

Some facts about sunspots and the solar cycle. Sunspots are dynamically located regions on the surface of the Sun known to be characterized by concentrated magnetic activity, they appear dark or as “spots” because those regions are approximately 35% cooler than the surrounding surface of the Sun. The increasing frequency and density of sun spot occurrences are part of the formula that planetary scientists use to plot the graph of a solar cycle.  The solar cycle has shown to be a wave motion peaking in 11 year cycles or “maximums” since routine study first started in 1843.  The current solar cycle is  number 24 which was to peak this year (2013), but planetary scientists are stumped, at least many are acting and talking that way,  as solar activity is fading from its predicted maximum. I should add that apparently sunspots are a kind of portal for the other solar activity that scientists look for, such as CMEs (Coronal Mass Ejections) and solar flares (invisible but explosive releases of bandwidth-wide electromagnetic radiation).  Without sunspots, CMEs and solar flares do not happen and so far this year the maximum is shaping up to be 50% shy of the 2001 maximum (number 23), which in turn was also short by about 30% from the  solar cycle number 22 (1990).

Now these dropping maximums, especially that of the very low activity of 2013, is very inconvenient for NASA. It throws a wrench into NASA’s nuclear Sun-bomb cover-up mechanics, one that was supposed to obliterate Earth in some kind of a massive super X-class CME. So no mr. cover-up, the Sun is actually sunspot-quiet for its 24th solar maximum.


Roswell ET, a.ka. “Skinny Bob”.

Additionally and not surprizingly, NASA’s cover-up team is moving the dates around: “Left with egg on their faces for all their wrong predictions, NASA scientists are now trying to re-write history. The solar maximum for cycle 24 was originally projected for 2010-2011. Then it was extended to 2012 to align with the 2012 Mayan Calendar predictions, in part, but also because the solar minimum was showing the Sun to be shockingly quiescent. Sunspots were virtually absent. Now as 2012 is past and the Sun has still not approached the expected maximum, they are pushing the dates once again. They are caught in a web of their own lies.” (quoted from ZetaTalk Chat 03/16/2013). Since the solar cycles maximums have been reliable since about 1950 (the start of the “modern maximums”) , why has 2013, and to some degree 2001 been such duds? Well the Zetas have explained that the south pole of Planet X acts as a magnetron intake and has had its south pole “pointed” at the Sun for some time now. This has been the cause for the quiet sun through these maximums. Now however, the Zetas have said that Planet X has moved. The Zetas: “But the grip Planet X has on the Earth, Venus, and the Dark Twin has been tightening lately, as Planet X is outbound and is closing the gap. Looking at this drama from outer space with the N Pole of Earth topside, one would have seen Planet X slightly to the right with Earth, Venus and the Dark Twin clustered to the left. For reasons too complicated to explain, due to the approach of the April Trimester which arrives on April 20, Planet X is pointing its N Pole more to the left, toward the cluster of planets. This skews Planet X so its S Pole is not pointing directly at the Sun, no longer acting as a direct intake for magnetrons from the Sun. Thus, sunspots are again appearing on the surface of the Sun.” (ZetaTalk Chat ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for 04/16/2011). Since this last ZetaTalk quote was from over 2 years ago, I can only assume a slow-moving Planet X will eventually allow the solar maximums to pick up. We will see, perhaps more interesting events will stump NASA’s planetary scientists.

Details taken from

Mouse on Mars


This image is taken from it’s source at a NASA website. Originally taken by either Spirit or Opportunity of the Mars Exploration Rover Mission that started in 2004 and is still in operation today (December, 2012). Now since the original is on the NASA website:
the naysayers have no where to go on this.

Life is unofficially found on Mars, but wouldn’t you know it to be the lowly mouse? Or, is it a woodland rat?  But it is  a rodent none-the-less!
While contemplating the juxtaposition of a live rodent poised there among the small rocks of Mars, it dawned on me: a breathable atmosphere! Another idea that occurred to me is that rodents are found where there is food, at least rodent food. This wee rodent is most likely wild, which means there are quite likely insects among the rocks and soil as well. Of course, as there are now mice on Mars, there must exist other larger forms of Life, not necessarily on Mars, still possibly there, but elsewhere mustn’t there? Surely there wouldn’t be a single mouse roaming the plains of Mars? The Zetas of ZetaTalk: “Mars sustained life such as herds of goats and sheep, and sustains life still.” The Zetas were referring to when the Annunaki lived openly on the surface of Mars, but then, the subject of the Annunaki is another story…
The next realization floating up to my awareness was one I identified with on a personal level, that the Mars mouse is yet another example supporting what has been said by many alert observers for years: that scientists, certainly those who manage the data, have been lying to the public about what they must have seen in their relatively short tenure in space travel. Omittance is the same as lying. The evidence is widespread that if a corporate or government paid scientist, of which there are many, are side-lined or worse, if they do not toe the official line.


“Project Mercury was the first human spaceflight program of the United States. It ran from 1959 through 1963 with two goals: putting a human in orbit around the Earth, and doing it before the Soviet Union, as part of the early space race. It succeeded in the first but not the second: in the first Mercury mission on 5 May 1961, Alan Shepard became the first American in space; however the Soviet Union had put Yuri Gagarin into space one month earlier. John Glenn became the first American (third overall, following Gagarin and Titov) to reach orbit on February 20, 1962, during the third manned Mercury flight. The drawing on left represents John Glenn’s Mercury capsule ‘Friendship 7′.”

The U.S. space program is only 54 years old and we suspect it is mainly oriented to U.S. military defense, even though it is officially declared a U.S. government agency designated as a civilian space program. The Zetas of ZetaTalk have made it very clear over the years, that NASA is under the thumb of the Council of Worlds and is watched very closely, by why? It is clear that NASA is working for the wealthy elite to use it’s space-vehicle earth take-off and landing services to provide a pole-shift escape route to the moon for the wealthy and the privileged. As an example of the influence of the Council of Worlds at the hand of the Zetas, consider the August 10, 2012 launching of Morpheus, the NASA designed robotic vertical moon take off and landing vehicle. It weighs 2,300 pounds and although powered by it’s own fuel tanks, it weighs 600 pounds less than the Friendship 7 space vehicle. It’s been 43 years since the first moon landing and you would think that NASA would be able to get Morpheus to take off and land in a controlled environment, but no, it crashed!


Image left: “Manufactured and assembled at NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC) and Armadillo Aerospace’s facility near Dallas. The prototype lander is a “spacecraft” that is about 10 feet in diameter, weighs approximately 2,300 pounds (1,000 kg) and consists of four silver spherical propellant tanks topped by avionics boxes and a web of wires.” Wikipedia. Photography by Paula Puffer.

NASA, a spiritually errant organization, is being chastised (again) in a most vulnerable way, the destruction of a primary space craft: don’t go here, is the message!
The downing of a relatively simple space craft is a unwitting clown-act by those who would seek to only serve themselves: a circus of the selfish.
Wake-up! Human science is compromised by political and elitist agendas! Let’s backtrack for an analogy. Speaking for myself, my personal awareness’s of the world around me were originally formed including the many biases my mother father unwittingly foisted upon me as a child. It takes many years, at least of my years, to realize that things I thought were true were entirely false! Laying in wait, I found many other beliefs that needed updating, so I’m still looking.
Self examination requires a committed willingness to sacrifice the comfort of a comparatively small life into an initially agonizing and distasteful, but highly rewarding expansion to a larger kind of life of being open to new truths and  concepts. The red flag for me, is when I encounter a desire that wants to automatically push-away a new concept. Those that fear this transition may cry “Conspiracy Theory!” but those strong enough to face the darkness within do seek to clear themselves of the accumulated junk of human living, they want to move closer to their destiny: the permanent reign of the freedom of thought. The freedom of thought allows us to move without restriction from one idea to another. Why would one reject the freedom of thought for the victimization of pre-packaged beliefs? This reign is permanent, as no one wants to return to thinking on rails once they are free of the tracks.

To consider the thought that our governments are an extension of the unconscious status quo of the masses is benign enough at first, but once we feel this new “grain of salt” disturbing our cherished beliefs, it comes down to the choice of whether we want the truth about the world around us or retreat to the comfort of accepting the pablum offered up to us by the controlling strata within established science. My point is that the sanitized and tidy little solar system we have been taught to believe in, that is supposedly devoid of any kind of Life or that of visiting or resident ETs, no longer makes any sense. Since we are lied to about one thing, the remaining balance of what is taught about our Universe is suspect as well. So now, there it is, a little mouse to expose the hundreds of years of control enjoyed by the wealthy elite and the science establishment.


“Is there life on Mars? An undated NASA handout photograph of Mars taken by the Mars Explorer Spirit shows what seems to be a figure striding across the surface of the planet.” BBC News.
Again, this image is still on the NASA website:

The above image, taken by the Mars explorer Spirit at it’s landing site in 2004, has been circulating the Internet for years. I believe it is a woman (or a statue of a woman?) sitting on the rocky outcropping: you can see her right thigh resting on top of her rocky perch. Certainly this is more evidence for life on Mars, but places a distant third to the image of a live rodent! infinity.small2

The Truth about Climate Change

Picture taken aboard the USCGC Healy in the Chukchi Sea during the final days of ocean data collection for the 2011 ICESCAPE mission.

Picture taken aboard the USCGC Healy in the Chukchi Sea during the final days of ocean data collection for the 2011 ICESCAPE mission.

Many articles have been written challenging G. W. Theory (G.W.T.) offering excellent discourse by experts and even retired climate scientists from around the world (Link to list of quotes) , but this article is written from the stand point of the presence of Planet X in our solar system.
I’ve yet to read one science writer who understands the whole G.W.T. picture and who has outlined the real reason for such a massive and diabolical discourse, however, the truth can be discovered when you know what to look for. When we are presented with a puzzling situation, it’s so satisfying to solve it, yet that “A Ha!” moment seems to have eluded the plethora of science journalists so far. I haven’t even found a writer who is at least puzzled by this massive boondoggle: they see the folly, yet the reason for it goes unnoticed. For those who are Pole-Shift aware it’s still a massive mental task to collate all the esoteric and extra-solar-system-sized points-of-view, so this unawareness is not surprising, if you don’t know the pattern, you can’t connect the dots.

G.W.T. has gone through a name change, at one time is was known as: “Global Warming Theory”, but these days it is known as “Climate Change” and “Global Warming”. I suspect the word “theory” was removed as an attempt to evoke more authentication by the public or perhaps this was planned as an easier route to acceptance by the scientific community, whatever the reason it is still the same concept.

The essential truth about G.W.T.  is not represented in the product issued by climate science spokespersons. G.W.T is in fact being trotted out on a slanted playing field of field-data sets either cherry-picked to support the concept, or pruned and shaped to fit what the climate science upper management deems necessary to maintain the lie and secure their jobs at the same time. Yes, climate scientists are side-lined if they challenge the G. W. Theory. From “The Hindu, Jairam Ramesh, Indian Environment Minister:  “Anyone who raises alternative climate theories is immediately branded as a climate atheist in an atmosphere of climate evangelists“.
A few years ago (2009), there was a website called: The website no longer exists, but it did provide the hundreds of emails gleaned (hacked) from  email servers within the University of East Anglia revealing obvious manipulation of data aimed at arbitrarily supporting G.W.T., plus many other revealing comments heavily compromising this so-called theory. These emails are available as a PDF at this LINK. There are now new G.W.T.-pudit-troubling revelations with the procurement of 5,000 more emails, anecdotally referred to as “Climate gate 2.0”, here again, dialogue between climate scientists are being revealed as clearly having an agenda supporting the G.W.T. concept without merit. Here is a Forbes magazine article about Climate Gate 2.0 at this LINK.

Why is it that “Climate Change” is always in the news? Scientific articles, (mainly) pro or con are being published many times a day on the Internet for years? There is more than an almost rabid over-zealousness here as G. W. T. is driven by powerful international forces, such as the I.P.C.C., the U.N. and the W.M.O. (no doubt many more organizations). It’s a continuous felt-hammering of the message, but only those heavily involved can understand it. When you actually read reports on “Climate Change”, it’s a mass of statistics, acronyms, and descriptions of protocol and a hierarchy of “initiatives” expressed in government-speak: very hard to follow. When something so arcane as the concepts of G. W. Theory is pushed so hard for so long, likely consuming billions of Dollars (since 1990) and with peer opposition, it’s pretty clear there is a hidden agenda here.


The above 2-part image: left side is not-to-scale, but suggests the relative thicknesses of Earth’s essential 5 layers of rock. Right side: is to-scale and shows how large the inner core is – 70% moon-sized.

G. W. Theory asserts that the so-called “green house gases”, of which a large percentage is water-vapor, re-reflects (in all directions) the heat emanating from the surface of the Earth back down to the surface of the Earth causing an overall rise of global temperature of 1.75 ° every 20 years. This means that less than 1 % of the atmosphere, the rarefied and invisible “greenhouse” gases (light and heat pass through) miles above the Earth are causing the entire globe to continually heat up. This, while the inner core of the Earth (70% moon-sized) is connected to the rest of the earth via rock (a better conductor than air) at a similar


Tungurahua volcano, a steep-sided, 16,479-foot stratovolcano located in Ecuador sits roughly 140 km south of the capital city of Quito: increase in activity August 2012.

temperature as that of the Sun at  5430 °C (or 9806  °F) doesn’t heat up the surface of the Earth? The theory also asserts that these green house gases are caused by human activity such as the internal combustion engine and industrial manufacturing.
It’s been said that volcanoes blow more volume of CO2 with a major eruption than cows can pass methane, gasoline-powered vehicles emit exhaust fumes and the smoke stacks of the world in many years. This reasonable pronouncement has not and cannot be proven without the scientific field work, which is unlikely to be monetized by the same organizations who want to stay on the white-list at the U.N.
Volcanoes no doubt emit the majority of the world’s CO2. Consider this, entire villages of people living near a volcano have been known to be gassed to death in their sleep with a silent release of volcanic gases: it’s uniformly released from the vent and flows down all sides of the volcano, washing over the entire base, of which the village is only a small part: now add thousands of volcanoes and 5 billion years. Earth’s volcanoes have been around a lot longer than human climate scientists, cars and even animals, but the G.W. theory-makers couldn’t use those facts as they had to find a way to blame man’s contribution as a way around the argument: “Well, why is the global temperature still livable if “Global Warming” started 5 billion years ago? Why blame human activity? Seems they need an identifiable scapegoat for the gullible, something they could point to and blame. It all seems like it could make sense to people who believe that modern science is above the control of political and corporate interests, but it isn’t and you can see this if you think outside-the-box.


A man marooned by flood waters, alongside his livestock, waves towards an Army helicopter for relief handouts in the Rajanpur district of Pakistan’s Punjab province on August 9, 2010. (REUTERS/Stringer)

So these are a few holes in G. W. Theory discussed, but wait,  there’s more! Even if G. W. Theory was true, and its not, but if it was, it doesn’t explain the host of Earth Changes we are seeing today: one percent of the atmosphere miles above the Earth is causing so many volcanoes to awaken and at the same time? Unprecedented and massive flooding in parts of the world (e.g. -Pakistan 2010 (and 2012 – before and after) Philippines – aug 2012. and Australia’s Brisbane floods explained here at, wild heat extremes in several countries within a day never before seen? or tornadoes in France and England. There are other Earth change events unmentioned here, yet G.W.T. utterly fails to explain away even these, but remember, it isn’t explaining anything as G. W. T. remains unproven, challenged and beleaguered by critics and of course undermined by the climate scientist themselves with the unanticipated release of their own emails.
So the question remains, “How is it that so much time, effort and money is being put into this G. W. Theory round peg that won’t fit the Earth Change square hole? It’s been 22 years since the I.P.C.C. published its first assessment report in 1990 and the only reason it’s standing today is due to a hidden agenda of the big-money international agencies propping it up.
The 6:00 O’clock evening news, is not the news. What we see and hear is only what Corporate and secret government agencies want us to hear.  G. W. Theory is a massive cover-up story, a cover designed specifically to prevent the public from identifying Planet X as the cause of the massive Earth changes the original cabal knew would be coming. The existence of Planet X in our solar system is the reality and G. W. Theory is the make-believe.  If some cause is proffered to the concerned but already over-tired and over-worked public for the worsening earth changes, yet so complex it cannot be understood by the average person on street, a constant barrage by both the guilty and innocent scientist is hoped to do the trick. Back-in-the-Day, the make-up story of G. W. Theory worked for a while, but with earth changes for some time now poking out of the texture of the climate change message, it now appears as a fantastical farce. infinity.small2