New Video Series: Canadian Pole-Shift Safe Locations – B.C. and Vancouver Island.

I have finally started my Canadian Pole-Shift Safe Location series. In this 1 hour and 3 minute video I have 3 sections: first. – the preamble is a little about my Planet X reporting background and the kick-off of my Canadian series of safe locations and then I segue into a quick overview of Planet X and the Pole-Shift. Second – I explain the geography and land-form of British Columbia as to how it relates to the Pole-Shift. Third – I cover Vancouver Island and it’s special situation with the Pole-Shift. I also have a tag on the end detailing a closer look at Vancouver Island.
Surviving the Pole-Shift is not just about making sure you are on solid ground for the Pole-Shift, far enough from the sea, and having your camp hidden enough to avoid having to deal with aggressive survivors or marauding gangs, it is much more than that. It is about community in some form or another and is about being close enough to the sea in the After-Time as an abundant source of food. We know that many people will not be able to move closer to the sea for the Pole-Shift, so for those persons it is important then to have a massive supply of food, but split-up and cached in secret locations. Growing food in the After-Time is essential in the After-Time, whether we are doing this ourselves, or several members of your survival community are, but there is a fly in the ointment:  the skies will not be what we are used to now. It’s rational to expect all the volcanoes of the “Ring of Fire” to be erupting for years in the After-Time, this is predicted by ZetaTalk. Therefore the skies will be grayed by fine ash in the stratosphere. Also, it is predicted that Earth will temporarily lose a large percentage of it’s atmosphere: this means low cloud and low air pressure for those people in very high mountains, such as South America. A dimmed Sun and reduced sunlight means growing food will be a challenge to be overcome. Low-light crops, perhaps special indoor growing environments will need to be planned for. Know your environment for the After-Time, your life and the life of your loved-ones depends on it.

 

Advertisements

Announcement: A Radio Interview on Planet X

radioA few days ago a gentlemen named Robert, who volunteers at WRFR 99.3, a free radio station in Rockland Maine USA, asked if I would do an interview about Planet X, to which I happily agreed. This particular radio show will be broadcast from 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM (Eastern Time Zone or UTC-05:00) this Wednesday, July 13th. I have calculated the time by global capitals here: world local times for this event or by popular global cities here. If cannot find your town/city in the list, just use the nearest city in your state or country that is in your time zone.
WRFR free radio Rockland, is a low-power FM radio station with a listening radius of about 10 miles, which is also “repeated” by W257BI from nearby Camden (Maine) which extends the FM air-wave reach to about a 20 to 40 mile radius along the Maine coastline. The station is set-up for internet-streaming as well, hence my post here if subscribers want to listen to the interview.
Robert had been researching Planet X for a few months and came across my Youtube Channel which is how he came to discover my work. We will likely be covering a lot of ground during the interview as he has asked me to expand on topics. Although the radio show is one hour long, I’ll be telephoning-in perhaps about 10 to 15 minutes into the radio show when my interview will start. I elected to call-in as the sound would be reproduced-to-air more efficiently.

The link to listen live is here:

References:
To listen live to WRFR anytime click on the lnk below:
http://s2.stationplaylist.com:7028/listen.mp3.m3u

Global Relative Time Chart (by country capitals) for the radio interview about Planet X:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20160714T0000&low=c

My Youtube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY6iyTdzI9ra_mY6LSC7iDQ

Tyche: The Veil of Nibiru

tyche-oort.cloud

The Oort Cloud in the Kuiper belt region at the very outer edge of our solar system as envisioned by Kagaya, a Japanese digital fine artist. This image gives us an idea of the scale of the hypothesized Oort Cloud, but it is thought to be mainly populated by ices of water, ammonia and methane with limited fragments of rock.

According to Greek mythology, Tyche was the “good sister” of Nemesis and the Greek Goddess of fortune and prosperity. However, in deference to the wisdom of the Greeks, there is now a new kind of mythology that, although it has roots within the history of modern astrophysics, does not spring from the likes of the venerated efforts of the eighteenth century astronomers who actually discovered real planets. A true cultural mythology arises from original stories and a set of beliefs passed along from our respective descendants over a long period of time, whereas today’s myths exist only within the Internet culture: mostly a quickly accessible, gullible and easily impressed net-mind.  To wit, considering that NASA and related government agencies have complete control of all scientific data from space probes, satellite and other space vehicles making the sum total of the entire set of space programs under the thumb of the secret government agencies we call “black ops”. It is these militaristic pro-government message cabals  who decide what information is exposed to the public realm and when. Tyche (pronounced ty-kee), the fanciful planet claimed to be 4 times larger than Jupiter that is supposed to be situated within the Oort Cloud: a hypothetical hoard of objects orbiting our solar system at the edge of the Sun’s gravity-influence comprized mainly of scattered water, ammonia and methane ices, is no exception. The Oort Cloud was proposed in 1950 by Jan Hendrik Oort, a Dutch astronomer, to explain long-period comets that occasionally zoom in around the Sun from any possible direction, boil-off and disintegrate; therefore a repository of these objects is believed to exist: the Oort Cloud. Additionally from a published report we have this:  “But scientists now believe the proof of (Tyche’s) existence has already been gathered by a NASA space telescope, Wise, and is just waiting to be analysed.”

WISE-Mission

The above image is an artist’s conception of the NASA Satellite WISE which was tasked to image the entire sky with a cooled infrared detector (15° Centigrade above absolute zero), by-the-way, perfect for detecting warm dwarf planets transiting the absolute zero background of stars. The Zetas: “Their WISE probe discovered a rogue planet, visible at a distance only in the infrared spectrum, and now it is approaching Earth!” Here is a link to a Youtube video of Amy Mainzer, an american astronomer acting as a public spokesperson for NASA speaking on WISE, here, you can see from 15 to 24 seconds of the video how her body language belies her statement that: “…we don’t think that there is anything hazardous in the outer solar system…”

So here we have two hypotheses, one existing inside the other, and the so-called “proof” of which has been put off to another condition: when some unknown person gets around to doing an evaluation of the cache of data looking for Tyche’s  existence.  The slightly more real, yet unobserved Oort Cloud, whose outer reaches extend to about a light year away from our Sun, has at least some history and a good scientific reason to exist, whereas such a whimsical planet as Tyche has all the wrong reasons to be true and doubting it’s existence is the right stuff.

px-perturbation-uranus

This image attempts to show how Uranus’ orbit was “pulled ahead” by Nibiru’s gravitational pull (a), and (b), is delayed from it’s predicted orbit position as Uranus moved away from the direction of Nibiru, thus the inverse gravitational influence. This anomaly is what piqued the interest of so many astronomers over the last 168 years. (px art by Chris Thomas).

The covert scientific awareness of Nibiru today can be credited to the discovery of the perturbed orbit of Uranus in 1845 by  John Couch Adams of England and coincidentally by Urbain Leverrier of France in the same year. Uranus was arriving ahead of it’s predicted movement as it approached the constellation Orion on it’s orbit path and lagged behind in it’s progress afterwards.  This realization (mathematically predicted to exist by Le Verrier) lead to the discovery of Neptune on the night of September 23–24, 1846 at the Berlin Observatory by astronomer Johann Gottfried Galle who was working from Le Verrier’s calculations. Now it was also found that Neptune also  had perturbations in it’s orbit, so now the search was on to find the gravitational body responsible. This lead to Clyde Tombaugh’s discovery of Pluto in 1930. Meanwhile in Flagstaff Arizona,  Percival Lowell was pushing ahead to find what he had coined: “Planet X”, the unknown heavenly body that was causing the irregularities in the outer planets of our solar system, but he died unexpectedly in 1916. It wasn’t until 1978 that American astronomer James W. Christy finally determined conclusively that Pluto’s size was only 1/500th that of Earth making it far too small a mass to cause the orbit irregularities of the gas giants. The search for Planet X continued with the chief astronomer of the U.S. Naval Observatory, Robert Harrington during the 1980s and 1990s where he determined that Planet X was 13.5 billion Kms away from our Sun, had a highly eccentric orbit with a 32-degree inclination to the orbital plane, these details which also align well with ZetaTalk. Unfortunately, Robert Harrington died of Cancer on Jan. 23, 1993 and according to the Zetas of ZetaTalk, Robert Harrington was killed as he intended to alert the public to the approach of Planet X. Here is a link to a list of killed or disappeared astronomers since 1981. It’s not a matter of public knowledge of course, but my guess is that it was sometime in the early 1980s that the Planet X cover-up seems to

px-night-sky.altered

Planet X as viewed with a telescope with a zoom lens from a backyard in North Carolina in the evening sky April 13, 2003. This is the real deal, but only visible as Planet X was zooming in from outer space; a period of time from about 1995 to late 2003. As Planet X was close-in but not yet near the Sun, it was viewable by binoculars. (Credit details & photo – ZetaTalk.com).

have started to develop. Robert Harrington’s paper entitled: “The Location of Planet X” (by R. S. Harrington, October 1988) is here on Harvard Universities servers.
If the plan of the U.S. black ops disinformation artists is to ever so slowly and masterfully reveal the truth about Nibiru (but at some last minute), this would be part of the plan, since with Tyche the mystery continues. Its still a mystery as Tyche, let’s face it, is an imaginary  planet, but what also still has legs is the mystery of perturbed heavenly bodies, but now they are comets. The story goes that in 1999 a small team of scientists dreamed-up Tyche to explain the fact that 20 percent too many comets are “coming from the wrong direction”. Aside from the fact that Tyche is the perfect placement for a public attention redirect from Nibiru/Planet X, planetary scientists have ran out of planets to discover and therefore blame for the mysterious aberrations in comet trajectories. It’s like the effects on heavenly bodies in our solar system caused by Planet X are haunting NASA planetary scientists, astronomers and astrophysicists because the perturbation issue just won’t go away, so they have to invent Tyche. Of course, how could Tyche be hypothetical since the solar system has been scanned with space probes since the Pioneer Program started in the 1960s? In addition, the ISS up since 1998, the 135 Shuttle missions between 1981 and 2011 and 85 current NASA missions still on the books haven’t noticed a planet the size of Tyche within a supposed cloud of comet-sized objects? Granted, the Oort cloud is farther out, yet the Hubble space telescope can “see” out to several billion light-years. So lets end the speculation that NASA et al can’t find a planet within the gravity-sphere of our solar system. NASA needs Tyche to continue the Planet X cover-up, lest a critical mass of the public starts to ask embarrassing questions.

infinity.small

zetaAddendum: Here is a great bit of reading from the Zetas of ZetaTalk on NASAs about face on the existence of wandering planets, Tyche notwithstanding.
NASA’s history of discovery on wandering rogue planets that seem to travel through space independent of a central Sun is not a pretty one. Similar to the Flat Earth the

ory, they clung to their theories righteously, angrily attacking the facts and any messenger bringing them those facts as though their egos were a holy place and the truth were the enemy. When ZetaTalk presented concepts that explained the behavior of such rogue or traveling planets, their failure to follow a circular orbit around a sun and the speed at which they can move through space, Nancy and ourselves were ridiculed for not understanding “the laws” of nature as purported by their God Newton. 

Little by little, inch by inch, they have admitted our facts, always in the context of a human discovery, such is their arrogance. If one revisits the history,  one sees that only since the start of the ZetaTalk saga have humans proposed theories and pursued discovery that remarkably parallel ourexplanations. Now wandering planets, previously denied entirely as even possible, are readily admitted. Previously NASA’s pet theory of “escape velocity” was asserted as a law, where now traveling planets that can escape the gravity draw of a sun, are admitted. 
Since NASA et al were so very busy defending their egos and precious theories, why have we begun to see articles in print wherein astronomers have discovered wandering planets? Why, after the search in the 1980’s for what was called “nemesis”, a gravity body in the direction of the constellation of Orion that was causing perturbations in the outer planets, is this theory now being reactivated? When Planet X was discovered there in 1983, all such talk of a gravity force there was forbidden, as JPL and NASA did indeed find Planet X with their infrared cameras. Is there some benefit to be gained by admitting that traveling planets exist, and encouraging the public to think that such a planet may exist just on the outskirts of the solar system?

When it became obvious that Planet X was zooming into the solar system, at the speed we had predicted, the establishment realized they would likely have to invent an excuse in case the passage was not swift. What if a body were visible, for months or years, so the public became restless and rebellious? While frantically ridiculing Nancy and ourselves, they had their cover-up minions purport that Planet X was “out past Jupiter”, and spread rumors of spots that Google Sky would not display. All the while, of course, Planet X and its Moon Swirls were showing up on SOHO and Stereo images, seen naked eye, and recently made a nice appearance during the May 20-21 (2012) lunar eclipse. Should Planet X itself suddenly become visible to all, they will announce that the suspected nemesis body at the fringes of the solar system moved, and will likely use a number of our explanations for the speed of bodies in space to explain its rapid arrival!

Addendum #2: Here is a link to a wonderful youtube video of Dr. Robert Harrington and Zecharia Sitchin discussing Pluto, the history of the solar system and “the intruder”. Two great scientists in their own field discussing a common interest: Planet X.

The Disappearing Solar Maximum.

solar.cycle.notated.med

Planet X is a massive magnet. The Zetas of ZetaTalk.com explain that the south pole of Planet X is a magnetron intake. In this depiction of Planet X (top image) the real extent of the magnetic lines of force are not shown, they would fill the space between Earth the Sun with their influence. Earth is not shown, but is off-image to the left. In the case of the disappearing solar cycle maximum numbers 23 and 24, the magnetrons otherwise causing sunspots are being drawn into the south pole of Planet X. The image of the Sun shown here was taken by John Chumack from his backyard in Dayton, Ohio on July 7, 2013. Credit: John Chumack | http://www.galacticimages.com – Artwork by Chris Thomas.

When I started research on the Sun’s magnetic poles to do this article, I found nothing but disinformation. I should  not have been surprized, however. I also found traces of removed  information, which is typical when someone is hiding something. One of the mainstays of the Planet X cover-up maintained by the élite hierarchy is a one hundred percent contrived threat from the Sun, but results from the Ulysses space probe (launched October 6, 1990 to study the Suns magnetic field) challenged this state-approved lie. Quoted from ZetaTalk.com: “In 1995, Ulysses saw strong and simple magnetic fields at both poles of the Sun.” (taken from  the JPL website – Jet Propulsion Lab – September 9, 2001). Nancy Lieder of ZetaTalk was one of those few who had noted the results published by JPL at that time, which supported what her Zetas had said all along: that our Sun has defined magnetic poles dominating the solar system. Now, we are certainly aware of the Planet X cover-up, but what has a cover-up of the facts about the Sun’s magnetic poles got to do with Planet X? Plenty, as you will see. First though, I want to focus a little on the timeline-effect of the Planet X cover-up dynamics.

I know many people roll their eyes when they hear of government cover-ups or conspiracy theories, but there is a subtle but far-reaching effect that is needing exposure here that may not be taken into account. The internet is rife with disinformation that has become legitimized. Legitimate in the eyes of the gullible, the uninformed or the casual researcher, in part, as some scientific material is published from a secondary or tertiary standpoint. In other words, scientific research assuming  the truth of a theory, is therefore innocently forwarded by way of reference. But its science, how is that possible? Here is a quote from David Icke: “Like so much in what we call science, that people take it as fact, it’s actually a theory which repeated it becomes fact.” (transcribed from “The moon is not real“). If you believe something is true without independent observation and research, your mind will seek it out. It is also called projection, everybody is susceptible. Scientists are people too, besides, why would they doubt their peers that work for the U.N., the I.P.C.C., the W.M.O.?  Lets also consider, that if a scientist opposes government or corporate-sponsored opinions, you can be sure that their professional life will become uncomfortable and for those who support him or her as well. This is common in the world: a threat from your peers if you oppose their established theories and beliefs, which in turn becomes a subconscious force to be reckoned with when those who you work for make veiled threats to cut-off your money supply. Here are some facts about another cherished theory: the U.S. government spends $10.6 million a day and $4 Billion annually on Climate Change research, and for some reason, some scientists do not not question that and those that do are red-flagged. So, all that money spent pursuing a disputed and unproven theory? We know that many scientists believe these officially established opinions, as when reading published material, not one word is offered-up that throws doubt on a theory supported by high level international organizations.  By-the-way, I am not speaking here of deliberately seeded lies, just disinformation innocently carried forward by others.

Accepted falsehoods have social-consciousness inertia. This occurs in many ways. My guess is that a significant amount of falsehood carry-on, besides published scientific research, is also found in published interviews, opinion pieces by retirees, industry pundits and the many media reports.  So it is this massive volume of “climate change” meta-cognition spin-off that is the problem. Once the cover-up is in place, it is the work of others that accumulates and seemingly buries the switcheroo in the official point-of-view. Two examples of the U.S. space agency about-faces: the original purposes of the Pioneer probes 10 and 11 and the Ulysses space probe were first published then retracted and replaced with a lie. These lies are now lost under the

sheer mass of ongoing published works that had falsely assumed that the stand-in counterfeit reports had value. But lets not forget that the cover-up is also driven forward by new lies seeded with half-truths and the misleading use of facts. There are many other sources of such gullible extrapolations based on government lies such as related science research on another subject that touches on the false theory, new government programs based on the original lie, but with a new vector.  For example, Climate Change (a.k.a. Global Warming Theory) was created as a cover for anticipated earth changes (likely taken from ZetaTalk) once Planet X got close in, as it is now. This is the base lie. Now the “kyoto Accord” or the “Kyoto Protocol” was developed by the United Nations as part of the Climate Change lie, an international treaty to supposedly reduce “greenhouse gas” generated around the globe. (“greenhouse gas” is a misleading moniker used as the main component in the Global Warming Theory lie). Now enters the tertiary effect in the cover-up timeline: “carbon credits”. Now Carbon Credits (one tonne of “greenhouse gas” per) were developed to be a way of dealing and trading against the difficulties of managing “greenhouse gas” or more commonly known as CO² emissions, between countries. From Wikipedia.org: ” Since GHG mitigation projects generate credits, this approach can be used to finance carbon reduction schemes between trading partners and around the world“.  So now you see, one lie built on another and another, this is how the cover-up propagates legitimacy.
The point in question though is: does the Sun have strong north and south magnetic poles? The Zetas of ZetaTalk say yes, but common thought science on the internet says different. If one searches for information on the Sun’s magnetic poles, all they will find is the current theory that claims that diffuse and/or dipole magnetic fields (both polarities side by side) are emanating dynamically from anywhere on Sun’s surface, even assertions that the Sun will manifest “quad poles”, but the most eccentric bald-faced lie is that the north and south magnetic poles “switch” polarity  in concert with the apex of each 11 year solar cycle. It is very odd and perhaps a little scary to find only the official viewpoint of the élite hierarchy on a subject. You would expect (hope?) to find a healthy mix of conflicting opinions and thoughts on a matter, scientists arguing, throwing their hands up in the air and drinking coffee over late night sessions trying to find common ground on the matter, but no, only a single controlled point of view with a slight bloody trail of removed web pages.

Schwabe

Heinrich Schwabe

The discovery of the Sun’s Cycle of maximums is attributed to Samuel Schwabe in 1843, this means the Sun’s 11 year solar cycle has been documented for approximately 170 years. Therefore, I think we can assume the truth of the solar cycle. But these other theories just don’t make sense.  The reasons for this confusing theory not making sense has many threads. First is that the Zetas have said that the sun has normal north and south magnetic pole activity, and on science points like this, they have excellent accuracy and track record. Second is that if all the other planets in our solar system have defined magnetic poles and all stand within the Sun’s magnetosphere, it stands to reason the Sun does as well. Oh, but the third is the worst science of all these recent lie-theories: the “flipping” of Earth’s magnetic poles. Human science has been aware of the Sun’s magnetic field since the 1600’s and we now know that most the planets in our solar system are magnetic and have various north and south pole orientations obviously under a prevailing magnetic regime. We also know that magnets align themselves within a dominant magnetic field. We also knowthat the Sun’s magnetosphere extends beyond Pluto (Voyager 1 has been traversing our solar system for almost 36 years (as of late July 2013), and has traveled 11.6 billion miles and planetary scientists are still not sure if it’s in interstellar space yet). It’s also reasonable that astronomers of old would have defined the appearance of the poles of the solar system planets and would have reported an “upside down” planet by now. There is no mention of flipping planets in the science books.

woodbrige.cropcircle

Woodbridge crop circle – July 13, 2004. The nuclear symbol in the center of two closed circles is a reassurance by the ET circle makers that the sun is not a nuclear threat. (Credit – ZetaTalk.com)

Regarding the Black ops lie of our Sun being a threat to Earth, I found another amazingly successful cover-up of a kind of evidence you would not expect: the Internet-wide removal of a specific crop circle! But first, allow me to give a quick background on Crop Circles. Without a doubt, ZetaTalk is the only reliable source in the world on the meaning of crop circles. Over the years, the Zetas of ZetaTalk have described the meanings of many crop circles. The theme is always a thoughtful care that the ET circle-makers offer humankind, consequently, all crop circles offer various kinds of assistance to Earth’s population. The language is subjective in nature, which is why ego-cultural-language is not used but a Universal language of symbol instead. The crop circle in question is known as: Woodbridge (July 13, 2004). The Zetas explain that Woodbridge is a reassurance that the Sun is not a nuclear threat to Earth. This is revealed first by the nuclear symbol in the center of the crop circle that is surrounded  by two other closed circles clearly indicating one hundred percent protection for all planets in our solar system. If a Google search was performed against:  “woodbridge crop circle”, the only image of this crop circle will be found on the ZetaTalk web servers. Now if you go to the best reporting source on crop circles: http://www.cropcircleconnector.com and run a search, you cannot find this crop circle, it’s like it didn’t happen! So again, Nancy Lieder has the only evidence of another cover-up. Perhaps any remaining conspiracy theory detractors will believe my earlier assertions, that you cannot find the original Ulysses public statement about the Sun’s poles being consistent and strongly polarized. So you can see why the élite hierarchy wanted this very obvious message of solar protection removed, and they did, INTERNET-WIDE.

solar-cycle-24

Sun spot graph for solar maximums 22, 23, and 24 showing the decline in solar maximums. Notice that cycle 24 is not plotted yet, therefore the curve is projected.

Some facts about sunspots and the solar cycle. Sunspots are dynamically located regions on the surface of the Sun known to be characterized by concentrated magnetic activity, they appear dark or as “spots” because those regions are approximately 35% cooler than the surrounding surface of the Sun. The increasing frequency and density of sun spot occurrences are part of the formula that planetary scientists use to plot the graph of a solar cycle.  The solar cycle has shown to be a wave motion peaking in 11 year cycles or “maximums” since routine study first started in 1843.  The current solar cycle is  number 24 which was to peak this year (2013), but planetary scientists are stumped, at least many are acting and talking that way,  as solar activity is fading from its predicted maximum. I should add that apparently sunspots are a kind of portal for the other solar activity that scientists look for, such as CMEs (Coronal Mass Ejections) and solar flares (invisible but explosive releases of bandwidth-wide electromagnetic radiation).  Without sunspots, CMEs and solar flares do not happen and so far this year the maximum is shaping up to be 50% shy of the 2001 maximum (number 23), which in turn was also short by about 30% from the  solar cycle number 22 (1990).

Now these dropping maximums, especially that of the very low activity of 2013, is very inconvenient for NASA. It throws a wrench into NASA’s nuclear Sun-bomb cover-up mechanics, one that was supposed to obliterate Earth in some kind of a massive super X-class CME. So no mr. cover-up, the Sun is actually sunspot-quiet for its 24th solar maximum.

zeta

Roswell ET, a.ka. “Skinny Bob”.

Additionally and not surprizingly, NASA’s cover-up team is moving the dates around: “Left with egg on their faces for all their wrong predictions, NASA scientists are now trying to re-write history. The solar maximum for cycle 24 was originally projected for 2010-2011. Then it was extended to 2012 to align with the 2012 Mayan Calendar predictions, in part, but also because the solar minimum was showing the Sun to be shockingly quiescent. Sunspots were virtually absent. Now as 2012 is past and the Sun has still not approached the expected maximum, they are pushing the dates once again. They are caught in a web of their own lies.” (quoted from ZetaTalk Chat 03/16/2013). Since the solar cycles maximums have been reliable since about 1950 (the start of the “modern maximums”) , why has 2013, and to some degree 2001 been such duds? Well the Zetas have explained that the south pole of Planet X acts as a magnetron intake and has had its south pole “pointed” at the Sun for some time now. This has been the cause for the quiet sun through these maximums. Now however, the Zetas have said that Planet X has moved. The Zetas: “But the grip Planet X has on the Earth, Venus, and the Dark Twin has been tightening lately, as Planet X is outbound and is closing the gap. Looking at this drama from outer space with the N Pole of Earth topside, one would have seen Planet X slightly to the right with Earth, Venus and the Dark Twin clustered to the left. For reasons too complicated to explain, due to the approach of the April Trimester which arrives on April 20, Planet X is pointing its N Pole more to the left, toward the cluster of planets. This skews Planet X so its S Pole is not pointing directly at the Sun, no longer acting as a direct intake for magnetrons from the Sun. Thus, sunspots are again appearing on the surface of the Sun.” (ZetaTalk Chat ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for 04/16/2011). Since this last ZetaTalk quote was from over 2 years ago, I can only assume a slow-moving Planet X will eventually allow the solar maximums to pick up. We will see, perhaps more interesting events will stump NASA’s planetary scientists.
infinity.small

Details taken from ZetaTalk.com.